Check out Psychological time vs clock time
This is a great article and gives you something to think about, both for yourself and for the characters you are creating. It's a great way to move character growth throughout your story.
Tuesday, August 17, 2010
Monday, July 19, 2010
More Quotes
Choose your enemies wisely, for that is what you will become.
Computers are stupid. People are smart.
Computers make people easier to use.
There are 10 kinds of people in the world, those that understand binary and those that don’t.
There is no such thing as a free lunch, but from time to time, you may encounter a free beer.
Complexity is built on many layers of simplicity.
This Asimov quote is probably one of my earliest favorites:
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" - Isaac Asimov
Computers are stupid. People are smart.
Computers make people easier to use.
There are 10 kinds of people in the world, those that understand binary and those that don’t.
There is no such thing as a free lunch, but from time to time, you may encounter a free beer.
Complexity is built on many layers of simplicity.
This Asimov quote is probably one of my earliest favorites:
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" - Isaac Asimov
Sun Tzu quotes
It takes twenty pounds of provisions to deliver one pound to a remote location.
Those who face the unprepared with preparation are victorious.
Invincibility is a matter of defense; Vulnerability is a matter of attack.
Defense is for times of insufficiency, Attack is for times of surplus.
Great wisdom is not obvious, great merit is not advertised.
When trouble is solved before it forms, who calls that clever. When their victory without battle, who talks of bravery.
By the comparison of measurements you know where victory and defeat lie.
Disorder arises from order, cowardice arises from courage, weakness arises from strength.
The brave can fight, the careful can guard, the intelligent can communicate. No one is useless For unfailingly secure defense, defend where there is no attack.
The ability to prevail, by changing and adapting, according to the opponent is called genius.
For the skilled it is profitable, for the unskilled it is dangerous.
Act after having made measurements. The one who first knows the measure of far and near wins.
Once people are unified, the brave cannot advance alone, the timid cannot retreat alone, this is the rule for employing a group.
Using order to deal with the disorderly, using calm to deal with the clamorous, is mastering the heart.
A surrounded army must be given a way out.
So the rule of military operations is not to count on opponents not coming, but to rely on having ways of dealing with them; not to count on opponents not attacking, but to rely on having what cannot be attacked.
If you can always remember danger when you are secure and remember chaos in times of order, watch out for danger and chaos while they are still formless and prevent them before they happen. This is the best of all.
When there are murmurings, lapses in duties and extended conversations, the loyalty of the group has been lost.
The six ways of defeat
1. First is not assessing numbers
2. Second is lack of a clear system of punishment and rewards
3. Third is failure in training
4. Fourth is irrational over-excitement
5. Fifth is ineffectiveness of law and order
6. Sixth is failure to chose the strong and resolute
Those who face the unprepared with preparation are victorious.
Invincibility is a matter of defense; Vulnerability is a matter of attack.
Defense is for times of insufficiency, Attack is for times of surplus.
Great wisdom is not obvious, great merit is not advertised.
When trouble is solved before it forms, who calls that clever. When their victory without battle, who talks of bravery.
By the comparison of measurements you know where victory and defeat lie.
Disorder arises from order, cowardice arises from courage, weakness arises from strength.
The brave can fight, the careful can guard, the intelligent can communicate. No one is useless For unfailingly secure defense, defend where there is no attack.
The ability to prevail, by changing and adapting, according to the opponent is called genius.
For the skilled it is profitable, for the unskilled it is dangerous.
Act after having made measurements. The one who first knows the measure of far and near wins.
Once people are unified, the brave cannot advance alone, the timid cannot retreat alone, this is the rule for employing a group.
Using order to deal with the disorderly, using calm to deal with the clamorous, is mastering the heart.
A surrounded army must be given a way out.
So the rule of military operations is not to count on opponents not coming, but to rely on having ways of dealing with them; not to count on opponents not attacking, but to rely on having what cannot be attacked.
If you can always remember danger when you are secure and remember chaos in times of order, watch out for danger and chaos while they are still formless and prevent them before they happen. This is the best of all.
When there are murmurings, lapses in duties and extended conversations, the loyalty of the group has been lost.
The six ways of defeat
1. First is not assessing numbers
2. Second is lack of a clear system of punishment and rewards
3. Third is failure in training
4. Fourth is irrational over-excitement
5. Fifth is ineffectiveness of law and order
6. Sixth is failure to chose the strong and resolute
Saturday, February 27, 2010
Paper or Plastic: Is a Book Still a Book? By author Scott Nicholson
Here's a free article for you to blog, post, publish, or throw away, as long as you include my byline and web address. Thanks and enjoy.
-------------
Paper or Plastic: Is a Book Still a Book?
By author Scott Nicholson
www.hauntedcomputer.com
Reading paper books is an emotional experience for which many of us have developed nostalgia. We remember our Dr. Seuss books, our early school readers, our library adventures, then the teen years and really ranging into our individual tastes. Right now, most of us did that with paper books. Ten years from now? I think not.
My first music of my own was a scratchy Rod Stewart vinyl LP I found in a dumpster (yeah, we were poor and didn't have much besides my dad's old-school country 8-tracks). I have a cassette tape of that scratchy vinyl LP, and that is my version of the experience--right down to the skip in the middle of "I'd Rather Go Blind." Even if I hear the song on a CD, my brain puts in the skip, because that's the way I know the song. If I sing it to myself, the skip is in there. That's my experience and my nostalgia.
Have you ever tried to play a vinyl album for a kid? They think you're nuts. Some people get fighting mad over the very idea of ebooks, as if this were Bradbury's "Fahrenheit 451." Paper books are "real books" or "true books," they say. Yet they still call CDs and iPod downloads "records" or "albums," the same name they used when the format was a large vinyl disc. And music wasn't harmed in the least. In fact, most of us who aren't crotchety old fuddyduds will allow that music is vaster, broader, and more experimental than ever because it is more easily shared and experienced.
I remember in the 1990s when a few Chicken Littlers were warning about the death of paper books. I laughed at them. I remember in the early 21st century when writers first started wondering about whether they should protect their electronic rights. The industry laughed at them. On Christmas Day, Amazon sold more ebooks than paper books. I'm not laughing anymore. I am selling ebooks. And I am writing books with the expectation that they will be ebooks. And I am planning the long arc of my remaining career with the intention of staying "in print" and viable. On my own if necessary. And passing that to my heirs for the life of copyright. It's not only realistic, it's stupid not to do it.
And, as with the ease of music proliferation because of technological advancement, I see reading returning to the working class. You know, those people who can't afford $25 books and can barely afford time to read them because they are busting their chops to feed and house a family. A $2 ebook they can read in small chunks, and the convenience of carrying around 1,500 books at all times, will get more people peeking "between the pages."
Since I became interested in this issue, my research has shown that Kindle, Nook, and other ereader-device owners not only buy and read more books than they ever have before, they are trying genres and subject matter they never would have picked up otherwise. One man on the Kindle Boards hadn't read a book in 30 years because of visual impairment. Because he can now blow up the text size, he has read four books since Christmas. Teachers are taking their Kindles into classrooms and making reading cool again. Kids already have their own personal devices and are used to them. That's their nostalgia.
Publishers are trying mightily to stem the tide because they are invested in an old model in which they control and dole out content and lock up writers' rights for as long as possible. It's a central and overlooked element of the current ebook pricing wars. That's a side issue for readers but it's going to become critical if you believe the author is why we buy books, not the physical means or channel through which the story travels.
I fully appreciate those who defend the smell of pulp and ink, the tactile sensation of pages, the brilliance of a four-color paper cover and foil-stamped title logo. Many book bloggers fiercely defend paper books and most won't review ebooks at all. But if you look closely, the blogging phenomenon took over the role of "real newspapers" in reviewing and announcing books, to such a degree that many bloggers now are on the reviewer lists of major publishers, and obviously have a vested interest in preserving the current model because they are getting cases of free books. I don't blame them for not reviewing ebooks, because then they are left with nothing but the experience, and everyone loves free stuff. Already, there is a new model developing in which ebook bloggers may be readying to take over for "real book bloggers."
I love paper books, and I believe they will be around for the rest of my lifetime. There will still be bookstores, but they will be specialty shops and antiquaries instead of mainstream commerce centers. How much money have you spent at your local indie bookstore lately? Can you even find an indie within a two-hour radius? Here in my small university town, we have one indie bookstore and one specialty store that sells vinyl records. We no longer have a store that sells CDs, and only one chain video store. Are vinyl records the only "real music" or VHS tapes the only "real movies"?
I still have plenty of paper books. Some I keep because of nostalgia. I look at the object and feel that same attachment as I would with the old Rod Stewart album if it were still around. Other books I give away, but I still have the experience of the story. The "paper book" object is separate from the "book" experience of the story. Objects are ephemeral and paper crumbles to dust. The experience endures.
-----------------
Scott Nicholson is the author of eight "real books" and six "fake books" (er, ebooks). Some of the real ones have the same stories as the fake ones. The difference is the "real books" have often been declared out of print by the publisher and removed from store shelves, so his dedicated readers must take extreme measures to find them, including plundering garage sales and stealing from the library. His ebooks are easily available and cheap. The Skull Ring and The Red Church are two such cheap books at under $2 each. But, as the commercials say, the experience is priceless. Visit Scott at http://hauntedcomputer.blogspot.com or http://writegoodordie.com
-------------
Paper or Plastic: Is a Book Still a Book?
By author Scott Nicholson
www.hauntedcomputer.com
Reading paper books is an emotional experience for which many of us have developed nostalgia. We remember our Dr. Seuss books, our early school readers, our library adventures, then the teen years and really ranging into our individual tastes. Right now, most of us did that with paper books. Ten years from now? I think not.
My first music of my own was a scratchy Rod Stewart vinyl LP I found in a dumpster (yeah, we were poor and didn't have much besides my dad's old-school country 8-tracks). I have a cassette tape of that scratchy vinyl LP, and that is my version of the experience--right down to the skip in the middle of "I'd Rather Go Blind." Even if I hear the song on a CD, my brain puts in the skip, because that's the way I know the song. If I sing it to myself, the skip is in there. That's my experience and my nostalgia.
Have you ever tried to play a vinyl album for a kid? They think you're nuts. Some people get fighting mad over the very idea of ebooks, as if this were Bradbury's "Fahrenheit 451." Paper books are "real books" or "true books," they say. Yet they still call CDs and iPod downloads "records" or "albums," the same name they used when the format was a large vinyl disc. And music wasn't harmed in the least. In fact, most of us who aren't crotchety old fuddyduds will allow that music is vaster, broader, and more experimental than ever because it is more easily shared and experienced.
I remember in the 1990s when a few Chicken Littlers were warning about the death of paper books. I laughed at them. I remember in the early 21st century when writers first started wondering about whether they should protect their electronic rights. The industry laughed at them. On Christmas Day, Amazon sold more ebooks than paper books. I'm not laughing anymore. I am selling ebooks. And I am writing books with the expectation that they will be ebooks. And I am planning the long arc of my remaining career with the intention of staying "in print" and viable. On my own if necessary. And passing that to my heirs for the life of copyright. It's not only realistic, it's stupid not to do it.
And, as with the ease of music proliferation because of technological advancement, I see reading returning to the working class. You know, those people who can't afford $25 books and can barely afford time to read them because they are busting their chops to feed and house a family. A $2 ebook they can read in small chunks, and the convenience of carrying around 1,500 books at all times, will get more people peeking "between the pages."
Since I became interested in this issue, my research has shown that Kindle, Nook, and other ereader-device owners not only buy and read more books than they ever have before, they are trying genres and subject matter they never would have picked up otherwise. One man on the Kindle Boards hadn't read a book in 30 years because of visual impairment. Because he can now blow up the text size, he has read four books since Christmas. Teachers are taking their Kindles into classrooms and making reading cool again. Kids already have their own personal devices and are used to them. That's their nostalgia.
Publishers are trying mightily to stem the tide because they are invested in an old model in which they control and dole out content and lock up writers' rights for as long as possible. It's a central and overlooked element of the current ebook pricing wars. That's a side issue for readers but it's going to become critical if you believe the author is why we buy books, not the physical means or channel through which the story travels.
I fully appreciate those who defend the smell of pulp and ink, the tactile sensation of pages, the brilliance of a four-color paper cover and foil-stamped title logo. Many book bloggers fiercely defend paper books and most won't review ebooks at all. But if you look closely, the blogging phenomenon took over the role of "real newspapers" in reviewing and announcing books, to such a degree that many bloggers now are on the reviewer lists of major publishers, and obviously have a vested interest in preserving the current model because they are getting cases of free books. I don't blame them for not reviewing ebooks, because then they are left with nothing but the experience, and everyone loves free stuff. Already, there is a new model developing in which ebook bloggers may be readying to take over for "real book bloggers."
I love paper books, and I believe they will be around for the rest of my lifetime. There will still be bookstores, but they will be specialty shops and antiquaries instead of mainstream commerce centers. How much money have you spent at your local indie bookstore lately? Can you even find an indie within a two-hour radius? Here in my small university town, we have one indie bookstore and one specialty store that sells vinyl records. We no longer have a store that sells CDs, and only one chain video store. Are vinyl records the only "real music" or VHS tapes the only "real movies"?
I still have plenty of paper books. Some I keep because of nostalgia. I look at the object and feel that same attachment as I would with the old Rod Stewart album if it were still around. Other books I give away, but I still have the experience of the story. The "paper book" object is separate from the "book" experience of the story. Objects are ephemeral and paper crumbles to dust. The experience endures.
-----------------
Scott Nicholson is the author of eight "real books" and six "fake books" (er, ebooks). Some of the real ones have the same stories as the fake ones. The difference is the "real books" have often been declared out of print by the publisher and removed from store shelves, so his dedicated readers must take extreme measures to find them, including plundering garage sales and stealing from the library. His ebooks are easily available and cheap. The Skull Ring and The Red Church are two such cheap books at under $2 each. But, as the commercials say, the experience is priceless. Visit Scott at http://hauntedcomputer.blogspot.com or http://writegoodordie.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)